A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children household. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to rigorous controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular efforts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which has considering that grow to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they were being intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included in detail through the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as audience sought to be aware of the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant during the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few simply just wanting to create a relatives house in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean all through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to Reside alongside one another prolonged following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.